RAN Strategy (Reading and Analyzing Nonfiction)
RAN Strategy (Reading and Analyzing Nonfiction) is a teaching method that is focused on critical reading and thinking skills when working with nonfiction texts. It enables readers to identify the main idea, assess arguments, and combine information, thus enhancing the learning and retention process.
The RAN Strategy contains the following important components: predicting, clarifying, questioning, and summarizing. Initially, the readers make predictions about the cover of the text, which activates prior knowledge. After that, they clarify the confusing points that they have, question the author's arguments, and then they summarize the main ideas by saying it in their own words which in turn reinforces their understanding.
The RAN Strategy is applicable in educational contexts, such as during guided reading sessions where the teachers can model the strategy and in this way encourage students to read nonfiction texts actively. Take, for example, the situation where students read a chapter on environmental science, and then they could predict results of climate change, clarify terms, raise questions about causes, and to sum up, what they found out to improve their understanding.
The RAN Strategy is a tool for understanding and memory, as it pushes readers to actively work with the text. Seeing to it that readers have to engage in some critical thinking about the text, which is one of the ways that they can be empowered to do so, will not only help them understand it but it will also be a form of strengthening their higher-order thinking skills. For instance, a historical narrative reader utilizing this method is often to a larger extent the person who relates the theme of a nonfiction book about history to present-day issues.
Certainly, the RAN Strategy is very flexible for digital nonfiction texts. Readers are able to implement the same techniques by utilizing web-based articles, e-books, or research papers. To illustrate, during their reading of a digital article on technology trends, they may forecast subsequent developments, elucidate technical terminologies, contest the reliability of sources, and synthesize the implications of the article findings.