Argument-focused Pedagogy
Argument-focused pedagogy is a teaching technique which is based on premise of providing opportunity for students to develop argumentation skills during the process of structured discourse and critical thingking. The method is crucial as it not only helps learners to build their logical skills but also to uncover, analyze and argue from the different points of view, which ultimately encourages their involvement and understanding of the learning material in various fields.
The major elements of argument-focused pedagogy are the development of critical thinking, the application of structured argumentation frameworks, and the incorporation of collaborative discourse. For instance, the use of Toulmin's Argument Model as a tool aids students in articulating their claims, supporting them with evidence, and addressing counterarguments, as a result of which they manage to improve their overall reasoning skills.
Argument-centric pedagogy promotes the involvement of the students in the activities by persuading them to take an active part and interact with their classmates. Creating a space for the students where they can share their opinions and contest each other's beliefs, they become more devoted to the learning process. For example, during the time of a debate, the scholars feel pushed to work out their standpoints precisely as it should be done, which in turn deepens their knowledge of the subject.
A means that teachers can use the argument-centric teaching method is through adding activities like debates, peer review sessions, and Socratic seminars into their course. These activities enable students to practice making arguments, listening to different perspectives, and giving suggestions to each other. For instance, during the peer review session, students evaluate each other's arguments based on the structuring of the argument, thereby developing their analytical capacity.
Argument-centered learning is a highly effective way of enhancing students' critical thinking skills by first preparing them to critique information authentically and then teach them to make valid arguments. Such an approach leads them to doubt preconceived notions, weigh up the facts, and see through prejudice. For example, when they dissect a contested question, learners become able to pick out different opinions and formulate sound arguments, which is a necessary skill for making actual decisions rationally.